|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| Example 10, Slide 23: Buckling of aft skirt under Load Case 1 |
|
| Example 10, Slide 24: GENOPT/tank2 prediction of buckling at theta=90 degrees from a PANDA-type model of the aft skirt |
|
| Example 10, Slide 25: buckling of tank/skirt system under lateral acceleration |
|
| GENOPT runstream, Slide 1 of 3: Page 1 of a typical GENOPT run stream |
|
| GENOPT runstream, Slide 2 of 3: Page 2 of a typical GENOPT run stream |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| GENOPT runstream, Slide 3 of 3: Page 3 of a typical GENOPT run stream |
|
| Example 11, Slide 1: Minimum weight design of an axially compressed isotropic prismatic panel consisting of a series of cylindrical segments and verif |
|
| Example 11, Slide 2: This STAGS finite element model clearly shows the geometry of a typical panel of the type treated in this paper |
|
| Example 11, Slide 3: Identification of some of the decision variables for optimization |
|
| Example 11, Slide 4: More decision variables and more panel cross-section geometry |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| Example 11, Slide 5: Evolution of the objective (panel WEIGHT) during design iterations carried out by the GENOPT processor called SUPEROPT |
|
| Example 11, Slide 6: Optimized panel cross-section profile the starting design of which is shown in the middle frame two slides ago |
|
| Example 11, Slide 7: Another optimized cross-section profile and general and local buckling modes |
|
| Example 11, Slide 8: General buckling modes of the same optimized cross-section profile shown in the previous slide, but extended to include the entir |
|
| Example 12, Slide 9: General buckling modes of the same optimized cross-section profile shown two slides ago, but extended to include 5xWIDTH |
|
|
