|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXAMPLE 5: Optimized axisymmetric thickness distribution in a deep-submergence tank |
|
EXAMPLE 6, Slide 1: Optimization of an internally blade-stiffened, axially compressed cylindrical shell with axially oriented T-stiffened weld lands |
|
EXAMPLE 6, Slide 2: Axially compressed cylindrical shell with six weld lands with T-shaped stringers |
|
EXAMPLE 6, Slide 3: Half of a weld land with a T-shaped stringer at its longitudinal edge |
|
EXAMPLE 6, Slide 4: Huge torus model of a cylindrical shell of length L |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXAMPLE 6, Slide 5: Objective versus design iterations during an execution of the GENOPT processor called "SUPEROPT" |
|
EXAMPLE 6, Slide 6: Design margins from PANDA2 for the optimized axially compressed, internally ring and stringer stiffened cylindrical "acreage" |
|
EXAMPLE 6, Slide 7: Design margins for the GENOPT-optimized stiffened cylindrical shell with T-stiffened weld lands spaced at 120 degrees |
|
EXAMPLE 6, Slide 8: Critical general buckling mode of the optimized axially compressed cylindrical shell with T-stiffened weld lands spaced at 120 deg |
|
EXAMPLE 6, Slide 9: General buckling of the axially compressed cylindrical shell from a 90-degree model with discrete stringers and smeared rings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXAMPLE 6, Slide 10: Local buckling of the optimized, axially compressed cylindrical shell |
|
EXAMPLE 6, Slide 11: STAGS model of the optimized axially compressed cylindrical panel with half of a T-stiffened weld land (foreground) |
|
EXAMPLE 6, Slide 12: General buckling mode from a 120-degree STAGS model of the optimized internally stiffened cylindrical shell |
|
EXAMPLE 6, Slide 13: Load-end-shortening curves from STAGS for optimized axially compressed stiffened cylindrical shells with three weld lands |
|
EXAMPLE 6, Slide 14: Effective stress predicted by a 60-degree STAGS model of the optimized internally stiffened cylindrical shell with 3 weld lands |
|
|